Main Page

From HFA-PEDIA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Chúng ta đọc thấy ở trong [http://imgur.com/hot?q=Kinh Kinh] Phật, quỷ thần có ngũ thông, ngoài lậu tận thông họ không có ra, họ có thiên nhãn thông, có túc mạng thông. Tuy quỷ thần có ngũ thông, nhưng năng lực đó hoàn toàn không thật lớn. Năng lực của thiên thần cao hơn rất nhiều so với quỷ thần. Thế nhưng người giao tiếp với thiên thần thì vô cùng ít, còn chuyện giao tiếp với quỷ thần thì rất nhiều. Ở trong nước và ngoài nước, sự việc này được ghi chép ở trong truyền thuyết, chúng ta đọc thấy rất nhiều. [https://pixabay.com/en/photos/?q=cho cho] nên chúng ta hiểu rõ nguồn gốc của truyền thuyết, không phải không có lửa mà có khói. (Trích giảng "Thái Thượng Cảm Ứng Thiên" - Lão Hòa Thượng Tịnh Không chủ giảng)
+
The study took spot in a real-life public well being setting. We worked with village medical doctors within the existing wellness care structure. This implies our study assessed the effectiveness of the intervention rather than its efficiency, which might facilitate replication and scale up. Also we combined qualitative and quantitative approaches, which gave us an opportunity to have a superior understanding of irrespective of whether and how the EPI app intervention had an effect on outcome measures. You can find also some limitations to our study. Firstly, we incorporated younger village medical doctors when there was more than one doctor in a village. We produced the assumption that they have been superior in a position to use smartphones. Therefore, the findings cannot be generalized for all health workers with a range of technology capabilities. Secondly, one particular year of implementation from the intervention was also quick, simply because throughout the course of implementation, the EPI app was constantly modified to get rid of the program errors and improve the usability.Chen et al. BMC Public Wellness (2016) 16:Page 14 ofBy the time we performed the end line survey, village doctors were nonetheless using EPI app, that will give us opportunity to conduct further study. Thirdly, 4 villages had been excluded from our study resulting from two villages in intervention group were as well remote to access. Also text messages had been send to parents each inside the intervention and control groups, which resulted in the estimated energy to reduce from 80 to 69 . Future studies needs to be carried out to evaluate which elements of mHealth interventions on youngster vaccination are most successful, like the effectiveness of EPI app and text messaging. Also further studies require to assess the effectiveness of the EPI app in increasing coverage over a longer time period and at a larger scale and to examine the impact of making use of a smartphone application on village doctors' time to total work, job satisfaction and their good quality of care.Author details 1 Division of Integrated Early Childhood Improvement, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, No. 2 Yabao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, China. 2Save the Children China Plan, 1202 Block B Huaxi Buling, 5 Linyin Street, Wuhou District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China. 3Global eHealth Unit, Department of Major Care and Public Wellness, Imperial College London, Reynolds developing 3rd floor, St Dunstans road, London W68RP, UK. 4Save the Kids China Program, 2-2-52 Jianwai Diplomatic Compound, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100600, China. 5Save the Children, 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20036, USA. Received: 24 February 2016 Accepted: 18 AugustConclusions We identified that working with the EPI app and text messaging reminders enhanced kid vaccination coverage. Having said that, EPI alone might not strengthen child vaccination coverage powerful. Improved function efficiency of village doctors was [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005422 title= journal.pcbi.1005422] also a crucial influence of your app. Further fileAdditional file 1: Raw database for EPI APP System. (XLSX 21421 kb) Acknowledgments We would like thank the [http://whysnowbike.com/members/poison63tie/activity/85139/ http://whysnowbike.com/members/poison63tie/activity/85139/] following people today: each of the caregivers who participated in our survey, village doctors who participated in our interviews, the nearby [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2011.638589 title= 10508619.2011.638589] interviewers, staff from Save the Young children and regional health bureau that supported our study. Funding The study was funded by the Save the Kids, China.
-
 
+
-
“Thọ trì”. “Thọ” là tiếp thọ. Những đạo lý mà Phật đã nói, những phương pháp mà Phật đã nói, những cảnh giới mà Phật đã nói, chúng ta phải tiếp nhận, chúng ta phải tin tưởng, đó là thọ. “Trì” là gì? Là giữ gìn không thể để mất đi, nhất định phải đem nó áp dụng ở ngay trong đời sống của chúng ta, dùng ở trong công việc thường ngày, trong đối nhân xử thế tiếp vật của chúng ta, phải đem những phương pháp đạo lý của Ngài đã nói ứng dụng mới được, đó mới gọi là thọ trì.
+
-
 
+
-
• Thứ nhất, chữ “Phật" Trước tiên, xin nói rõ với quí vị chữ "Phật". Xã hội hiện đại có rất nhiều người hiểu sai đi chữ này, nếu nói Phật giáo là mê tín thì đó là không hiểu rõ đối với chữ “Phật” này. Nguồn gốc của chữ “Phật” là từ trong văn Phạn của Ấn Độ, dịch âm là “Phật Đà Gia”, người Trung Quốc thích đơn giản nên bỏ đi âm đuôi, chỉ gọi là "Phật". Vào thời xưa không có chữ “Phật”, chữ này là từ khi Phật giáo truyền đến Trung Quốc mới được tạo ra. Trong chữ xưa chỉ có chữ “Phất”, âm này không có bộ “nhân” ở bên chữ "Phất”. Thế nhưng, khi Kinh Phật từ Ấn Độ truyền đến, vì "Phật" là một người, cho nên người xưa đem chữ "nhân" thêm vào một bên, do đó chữ “Phật” này được tạo ra từ trong quá trình phiên dịch Kinh, vào thời xưa chỉ có chữ "Phất".(Trích Giảng "Phật thuyết thập thiện nghiệp đạo kinh" - Lão Hòa Thượng Tịnh Không chủ giảng)
+
-
 
+
-
Tất cả sản phẩm [https://phapduyen.com/danh-muc/tuong/dia-tang-vuong-bo-tat/ tuong duc dia tang] đều có thể tham khảo
+

Revision as of 14:37, 3 February 2018

The study took spot in a real-life public well being setting. We worked with village medical doctors within the existing wellness care structure. This implies our study assessed the effectiveness of the intervention rather than its efficiency, which might facilitate replication and scale up. Also we combined qualitative and quantitative approaches, which gave us an opportunity to have a superior understanding of irrespective of whether and how the EPI app intervention had an effect on outcome measures. You can find also some limitations to our study. Firstly, we incorporated younger village medical doctors when there was more than one doctor in a village. We produced the assumption that they have been superior in a position to use smartphones. Therefore, the findings cannot be generalized for all health workers with a range of technology capabilities. Secondly, one particular year of implementation from the intervention was also quick, simply because throughout the course of implementation, the EPI app was constantly modified to get rid of the program errors and improve the usability.Chen et al. BMC Public Wellness (2016) 16:Page 14 ofBy the time we performed the end line survey, village doctors were nonetheless using EPI app, that will give us opportunity to conduct further study. Thirdly, 4 villages had been excluded from our study resulting from two villages in intervention group were as well remote to access. Also text messages had been send to parents each inside the intervention and control groups, which resulted in the estimated energy to reduce from 80 to 69 . Future studies needs to be carried out to evaluate which elements of mHealth interventions on youngster vaccination are most successful, like the effectiveness of EPI app and text messaging. Also further studies require to assess the effectiveness of the EPI app in increasing coverage over a longer time period and at a larger scale and to examine the impact of making use of a smartphone application on village doctors' time to total work, job satisfaction and their good quality of care.Author details 1 Division of Integrated Early Childhood Improvement, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, No. 2 Yabao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, China. 2Save the Children China Plan, 1202 Block B Huaxi Buling, 5 Linyin Street, Wuhou District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China. 3Global eHealth Unit, Department of Major Care and Public Wellness, Imperial College London, Reynolds developing 3rd floor, St Dunstans road, London W68RP, UK. 4Save the Kids China Program, 2-2-52 Jianwai Diplomatic Compound, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100600, China. 5Save the Children, 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20036, USA. Received: 24 February 2016 Accepted: 18 AugustConclusions We identified that working with the EPI app and text messaging reminders enhanced kid vaccination coverage. Having said that, EPI alone might not strengthen child vaccination coverage powerful. Improved function efficiency of village doctors was title= journal.pcbi.1005422 also a crucial influence of your app. Further fileAdditional file 1: Raw database for EPI APP System. (XLSX 21421 kb) Acknowledgments We would like thank the http://whysnowbike.com/members/poison63tie/activity/85139/ following people today: each of the caregivers who participated in our survey, village doctors who participated in our interviews, the nearby title= 10508619.2011.638589 interviewers, staff from Save the Young children and regional health bureau that supported our study. Funding The study was funded by the Save the Kids, China.

Personal tools