International Strategy for Disaster Reduction A SAFER WORLD in the 21st CENTURY: Disaster and Risk Reduction

The International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) was adopted during the 1999 IDNDR Programme Forum, held in July 1999 in Geneva, and ratified by the United Nations’ Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and General Assembly during the second meeting of its Commission on Sustainable Development. More than 20 speakers at the CSD spoke in favour of the Strategy and the proposed institutional arrangements in November 1999, and a resolution to that effect was adopted.

The following is a summary of the International Strategy as agreed to during the July 1999 IDNDR Programme forum. The whole text may be found at
http://www.disaster.info.desastres.net/idndr/idndr.htm

While hazards are inevitable, and the elimination of all risk is impossible, there are many technical measures, traditional practices, and public experience that can reduce the extent or severity of economic and social disasters. Hazards and emergency requirements are a part of living with nature, but human behavior can be changed. In the words of the Secretary General,

“We must, above all, shift from a culture of reaction to a culture of prevention. Prevention is not only more humane than cure; it is also much cheaper… Above all, let us not forget that disaster prevention is a moral imperative, no less than reducing the risks of war”.

Vision

To enable all communities to become resilient to the effects of natural, technological and environmental hazards, reducing the compound risks they pose to social and economic vulnerabilities within modern societies.

To proceed from protection against hazards to the management of risk through the integration of risk prevention into sustainable development.
Goals

1. Increase public awareness of the risks that natural, technological and environmental hazards pose to modern societies.
2. Obtain commitment by public authorities to reduce risks to people, their livelihoods, social and economic infrastructure, and environmental resources.
3. Engage public participation at all levels of implementation to create disaster-resistant communities through increased partnership and expanded risk reduction networks at all levels.
4. Reduce the economic and social losses of disasters as measured, for example, by Gross Domestic Product.

Objectives

1. Stimulate research and application, provide knowledge, convey experience, build capabilities and allocate necessary resources for reducing or preventing severe and recurrent impacts of hazards, for those people most vulnerable.
2. Increase opportunities for organizations and multi-disciplinary relationships to foster more scientific and technical contributions to the public decision-making process in matters of hazard, risk and disaster prevention.
3. Develop a more proactive interface between management of natural resources and risk reduction practices.
4. Form a global community dedicated to making risk and disaster prevention a public value.
5. Link risk prevention and economic competitiveness issues to enhance opportunities for greater economic partnerships.
6. Complete comprehensives risk assessments and integrate them within development plans.
7. Develop and apply risk reduction strategies and mitigation measures with supporting arrangements and resources for disaster prevention at all levels of activity.
8. Identify and engage designated authorities, professionals drawn from the widest possible range of expertise, and community leaders to develop increased partnership activities.
9. Establish risk monitoring capabilities, and early warning systems as integrated processes, with particular attention being given to emerging hazards with global implications such as those related to climate variation and change, at all levels of responsibility.
10. Develop sustained programs of public information and institutionalized educational components pertaining to hazards and their effects, risk management practices and disaster prevention activities, for all ages.
11. Establish internationally and professionally agreed standards / methodologies for the analysis and expression of the souci-economic impacts of disasters on societies.
12. Seek innovative funding mechanisms dedicated to sustained risk and disaster prevention activities.

Implementation

• Conduct a national audit or assessment process of existing functions necessary for a comprehensive and integrated national strategy of hazard, risk and disaster prevention, projected over 5-10 and 20 year time periods.
• Conduct dynamic risk analysis with specific consideration of demographics, urban growth, and the interaction or compound relationships between natural, technological and environmental factors.
• Build, or where existing, strengthen regional/sub-regional, national and international approaches, and collaborative organizational arrangements that can increase hazard, risk and disaster prevention capabilities and activities.
• Establish coordination mechanisms for greater coherence and improved effectiveness of combined hazard, risk and disaster prevention strategies at all levels of responsibility.
• Promote and encourage know-how transfer through partnership and among countries with particular attention given in the transfer of experience amongst those countries most exposed to risks.
• Establish national, regional/sub-regional, and global information exchanges, facilities, or websites dedicated to hazard, risk and disaster prevention, linked by agreed communication standards and protocols to facilitate interchange.
• Link efforts of hazard, risk and disaster prevention more closely with the Agenda 21 implementation process for enhanced synergy with environmental and sustainable development issues.
• Focus multi-year risk reduction strategies on urban concentration and mega-city environments.
• Institute comprehensive application of land-use planning and programmes in hazard prone-environments.
• Develop and apply standard forms of statistical recording of risk factors, disaster occurrences and their consequences to enable more consistent comparisons.
• Undertake periodic reviews of accomplishments in hazard, risk and disaster reduction efforts at all levels of engagement and responsibility.
• Study the feasibility of specific alternative funding and resource allocation modalities that can ensure continued commitment to sustained risk and disaster prevention strategies.